Which of the following options is NOT a responsibility of editors towards reviewers?

Providing unlimited confidentiality is not a responsibility of editors towards reviewers. While it is crucial for editors to ensure that the review process protects the identities of the reviewers and maintains confidentiality regarding the content of the submissions, there are often limits to this confidentiality. For instance, in certain circumstances, such as suspected ethical violations, a reviewer’s identity may need to be disclosed to uphold the integrity of the review process.

In contrast, establishing clear instructions for the review process, ensuring that reviews are completed promptly, and assigning papers appropriate to reviewers’ expertise are all standard responsibilities of editors. Clear instructions help reviewers understand expectations, while prompt completion is vital to maintain the journal’s schedule. Assigning papers based on a reviewer’s expertise ensures that the review process is thorough and constructive. Thus, while confidentiality is important, it is not typically viewed as an unlimited obligation.