What is the primary concern for editors when managing DURC submissions?

The primary concern for editors when managing Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) submissions is to identify potential risks without censoring scientific contributions. This approach recognizes the delicate balance between the necessity of allowing scientific advancements to contribute to public knowledge and safety, while also being vigilant about the potential misuse of such research.

Editors are tasked with evaluating the implications of research findings that could be misapplied in harmful ways, making it essential to proceed thoughtfully. This means considering the broader social, ethical, and scientific contexts of the research. By focusing on risk identification, editors strive to promote responsible research dissemination, ensuring that valuable scientific discoveries are shared while addressing safety and ethical concerns effectively. This careful evaluation helps protect against the potential negative implications of such research without stifling scientific inquiry or essential advancements.

The primary responsibility does not lean towards rapid publication, avoiding submission processes, or limiting author participation in the review, as these options do not reflect the core issue of balancing safety with scientific integrity.